If you get to this point in a libel suit against you, you have lost, unless you go forward with a trial and can prove according to a preponderance of the evidence that the factual claims are true (or it's otherwise privileged). Citing specific factual claims that they claim are false and defamatory, even bolding the specific statements quote from the review. Having done libel training, reading the letter it was apparent they are on solid legal ground. I went into this article ready to believe the company and lawyer were terrible wastes of existence. I won't be recommending Medialink products to anyone unless they drop the issue and apologize - not that I normally recommend Medialink products anyway, they are middling quality at best. But even if neither are true, did the reviewer maliciously and knowingly lie about those facts? I wouldn't want to be the lawyer that had to prove that in court. To be fair, both the mentioned issue in the letter are questions of fact.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |